This week's prompt:
Discuss your thoughts on sentimentality in literature.
When is emotion in literature effective and when is it superfluous?
Use examples.
My reply:
E. M. Forster wrote: 'A fact is "The queen died and the king died."
A story is "The queen died and the king died of a broken heart."'
I prefer stories.
This blog hop is open to blogs
that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction,
classic literature, and general literary discussion.
Use examples.
My reply:
E. M. Forster wrote: 'A fact is "The queen died and the king died."
A story is "The queen died and the king died of a broken heart."'
I prefer stories.
This blog hop is open to blogs
that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction,
classic literature, and general literary discussion.
That is a fantastic quote. It describes emotion in literature very nicely.
ReplyDeleteI love that your post gets right to the point. Thanks for sharing that Forster quote. -Miss GOP
ReplyDeleteI've always known that quote as "The king died and then the queen died is a story. The king died and then the queen died of grief is a novel."
ReplyDeleteIt's a great quote either way.
lovely succinct & to the point, was expecting you to argue on whether emotions exist or not.
ReplyDeleteyou should really teach a class in explaining complex literary concepts in 50 words or less...I love this quote!
ReplyDeleteLove the brevity. It tells a story.
ReplyDeleteCheck out my hop here.
Perfect choice...and how timely with the royal wedding and all :)
ReplyDeleteYes it is a great quote-I need to read more Forester
ReplyDeletePerhaps this is why I work in primary schools.
ReplyDeleteYes, brevity is indeed the soul of wit. Nicely done!
ReplyDeleteA comment said so succinctly,
ReplyDeleteIs both very Queenly and Kingly!
Yes it is a great quote-I have to read a lot more Forester
ReplyDelete